Ulcer: A disruption of the mucosal integrity of the stomach and/or duodenum leading to
a local defect or excavation due
to active inflammation.
•
Ulcers
are defined as a break in the mucosal surface >5 mm in size, with depth to
the
submucosa.
Types
•
PUD
encompasses both
Gastric ulcers (GU)
Duodenal ulcers (DU)
•
Duodenal
(DU) and gastric ulcers (GU) share many common features in terms of
pathogenesis, diagnosis, and
treatment, but several factors distinguish them from one
another
•
Ulcers
occur within the stomach and/or duodenum are often chronic in nature
Pathology
Gastroduodenal
Mucosal Defense
•
The gastric epithelium is under constant assault by a series of endogenous
noxious
factors including hydrochloric
acid (HCl), pepsinogen/pepsin, and bile salts.
•
In
addition, a steady flow of exogenous substances such as medications, alcohol,
and
bacteria encounter the gastric
mucosa.
•
A highly intricate biologic system is in place to provide defense from mucosal
injury and
to repair any injury that may
occur.
•
The mucosal defense system is a three-level barrier, composed of pre epithelial,
epithelial, and subepithelial
elements.
•
The first line of defense is a mucus-bicarbonate layer, which serves as a
physicochemical
the barrier to multiple molecules
including hydrogen ions.
•
Surface
epithelial cells provide the next line of defense through several factors,
including
mucus production, epithelial cell
ionic transporters that maintain intracellular pH and
bicarbonate production, and
intracellular tight junctions.
•
If
the pre-epithelial barrier was breached, gastric epithelial cells bordering a
site of
injury can migrate to restore a
damaged region (restitution).
•
Larger
defects that are not effectively repaired by restitution require cell
proliferation.
•
The elaborate microvascular system within the gastric submucosal layer is the key
component of the subepithelial
defense/repair system. A rich submucosal circulatory bed
provides bicarbonate (HCO3⁺),
which neutralizes the acid generated by the parietal cell
secretion of HCl.
•
Prostaglandins
play a central role in gastric epithelial defense/repair. The gastric mucosa
contains abundant levels of
prostaglandins.
•
Hydrochloric
acid and pepsinogen are the two principal gastric secretory products
capable of inducing mucosal
injury.
Epidemiology
& Aetiology
Duodenal Ulcers
(DU)
•
DUs
are estimated to occur in 6 to 15% of the western population.
•
Before
the discovery of H. pylori, the natural history of DUs was typified by
frequent
recurrences after initial
therapy.
•
Eradication
of H. pylori has greatly reduced these recurrence rates.
•
DUs
occur most often in the first portion of the duodenum (>95%), with ~90% located
within 3 cm of the pylorus.
•
Malignant
duodenal ulcers are extremely rare.
Gastric Ulcers
(GU)
•
Gus
tends to occur later in life than duodenal lesions, with a peak incidence
reported in
the sixth decade.
•
More
then half of Gus occurs in males.
•
Are
less common than DUs, perhaps due to the higher likelihood of Gus being silent
and
presenting only after a
complication develops.
•
Autopsy
studies suggest a similar incidence of DUs and Gus.
•
In contrast to DUs, Gus can represent a malignancy.
•
Benign
Gus associated with H. pylori is associated with antral gastritis.
•
In, In contrast, NSAID-related Gus is not accompanied by chronic active gastritis but
may
instead have evidence of a
chemical gastropathy.
Etiology
•
It
is now clear that H. pylori and NSAID-induced injury account for the
majority of DUs
and Gus.
•
Gastric
acid contributes to mucosal injury but does not play a primary role.
H. Pylori and
Acid Peptic Disorders
•
Gastric
infection with the bacterium H. pylori accounts for the majority of PUD.
•
This organism also plays a role in the development of gastric mucosal-associated
lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma
and gastric adenocarcinoma.
•
It
is still not clear how this organism, which is in the stomach, causes
ulceration in the
duodenum, or whether its
eradication will lead to a decrease in gastric cancer.
NSAIDs-Induced
Disease
•
NSAIDs
represent one of the most commonly used medications
•
The spectrum of NSAID-induced morbidity ranges from nausea and dyspepsia to a
serious gastrointestinal
complication such as frank peptic ulceration complicated by
bleeding or perforation.
•
Unfortunately,
dyspeptic symptoms do not correlate with NSAID-induced pathology.
•
Over
80% of patients with serious NSAID-related complications do not have preceding
dyspepsia.
•
In
view of the lack of warning signs, it is important to identify patients who are
at
increased risk for morbidity and
mortality related to NSAID usage.
Cigarette
Smoking
•
Not
only have smokers been found to have ulcers more frequently than do nonsmokers,
but smoking appears to decrease
healing rates, impair response to therapy, and increase
ulcer-related complications such
as perforation.
•
The mechanism responsible for increased ulcer diathesis in smokers is unknown.
Genetic
Predisposition
•
First-degree
relatives of DU patients are three times as likely to develop an ulcer.
However, the potential role of H.
pylori infection in contacts is a major consideration.
•
Increased
frequency in people with blood group O.
•
However,
H. pylori preferentially bind to group O antigens. Therefore, the role of
genetic
predisposition in common PUD has
not been established
Psychological
Stress
•
But
studies examining the role of psychological factors in its pathogenesis have
generated conflicting results.
•
Although
PUD is associated with certain personality traits (neuroticism), these same
traits are also present in
individuals with non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD) and other functional
and organic disorders.
•
Although
more work in this area is needed, no typical PUD personality has been found.
Diet
•
Certain
foods can cause dyspepsia, but no convincing studies indicate an association
between ulcer formation and a
specific diet.
•
This
is also true for beverages containing alcohol and caffeine
Conclusion
•
Multiple
factors play a role in the pathogenesis of PUD
•
The
two predominant causes are H. pylori infection and NSAID ingestion
•
Independent
of the inciting or injurious agent, peptic ulcers develop as a result of an
imbalance between mucosal
protection/repair and aggressive factors
•
Gastric acid plays an essential role in mucosal injury
History
•
Epigastric
pain – has poor predictive value for the presence of either DU or GU
Epigastric pain is described as a
burning or gnawing discomfort can be present in both
DU and GU
The discomfort is also described
as an ill-defined, aching sensation or as a hunger pain.
The typical pain pattern in DU
occurs 90 min to 3 hours after a meal and is frequently
relieved by antacids or food
Pain that awakes the patient from
sleep (between midnight and 3 A.M.) is the most
discriminating symptom, with
two-thirds of DU patients describing this complaint.
Unfortunately, this symptom is
also present in one-third of patients with NUD.
The pain pattern in GU patients
maybe different from that in DU patients, where
discomfort may actually be precipitated
by food.
•
Nausea
and weight loss occurs more commonly in GU patients.
•
Dyspepsia
that becomes constant, is no longer relieved by food or antacids, or radiates
to
the back may indicate a
penetrating ulcer.
•
Sudden onset of severe, generalized abdominal pain may indicate a perforation.
•
Pain
worsening with meals, nausea, and vomiting of undigested food suggest gastrically
outlet obstruction.
•
Tarry
stools or coffee-ground emesis indicate bleeding.
Physical
Examination
•
Epigastric
tenderness is the most frequent finding in patients with GU or DU.
•
Physical examination is critically important for discovering evidence of ulcer
complication. Tachycardia and
orthostasis suggest dehydration secondary to vomiting or
active gastrointestinal blood
loss.
• A severely tender, board-like abdomen suggests perforation.
•
Presence
of a succussion splash indicates retained fluid in the stomach, suggesting
gastric
outlet obstruction.
PUD-Related
Complications
•
Gastrointestinal
Bleeding is the most common complication.
•
Perforation
is the second most common ulcer-related complication.
•
Penetration
is a form of perforation in which the ulcer bed tunnels into an adjacent organ.
DUs tend to penetrate posteriorly
into the pancreas, leading to pancreatitis.
Gus tends to penetrate into the
left hepatic lobe.
•
Gastric
Outlet Obstruction is the least common ulcer-related complication.
Differential
Diagnosis and Investigations
•
The
most commonly encountered diagnosis among patients seen for upper abdominal
discomfort is non-ulcer dyspepsia
(NUD).
•
NUD,
also known as functional dyspepsia or essential dyspepsia, refers to a group of
heterogeneous disorders typified
by upper abdominal pain without the presence of an
ulcer.
•
Several
additional disease processes that may present with ‘ulcer-like symptoms
include
Gastroesophageal reflux
Pancreasticcobiliary disease
(biliary colic, chronic pancreatitis)
Proximal gastrointestinal tumors
Vascular disease
Crohn's disease
Investigations
•
No
investigation for the peptic ulcer that can be done at the dispensary or health
center level,
hence patients with suspected peptic ulcers should be referred for investigations.
•
Documentation
of an ulcer requires either a radiographic (barium study) or an endoscopic
procedure.
Barium Meal
•
Barium
studies of the proximal gastrointestinal tract are still commonly used as a
first test
for documenting an ulcer.
•
The
sensitivity of older single-contrast barium meals for detecting a DU is as high
as
80%, with a double-contrast study
providing detection rates as high as 90%.
•
Radiographic
studies that show a GU must be followed by endoscopy and biopsy.
Endoscopy
(Esophagogastroduodenoscopy -OGD)
•
Provides
the most sensitive and specific approach for examining the upper
gastrointestinal tract.
•
Permits
direct visualization of the mucosa, endoscopy facilitates photographic
documentation of a mucosal defect
and tissue biopsy to rule out malignancy (GU) or
H. pylori
Diagnosis of H.
Pylori
•
The
tests for these are done in more specialized hospitals and maybe for research
purposes.
•
Several H. pylori tests are available. They are classified as either
non-endoscopy
based or endoscopy based.
•
Non-endoscopy-based
H. pylori tests are available.
H. pylori stool antigen
test (HpSA)
Urea breathe test
Presence of antibodies to H.
pylori in the serum
•
Three
endoscopy-based H. pylori tests are available
Rapid urease test (RUT)
Bacterial culture H. pylori
Histologic detection of H.
pylori in the biopsy specimen
Treatment
•
Essentially
treatment is initiated at the hospital, at dispensary what is done is
follow-up,
and pre-referral treatment of
suspected PUD is the same as in Gastritis.
•
Before
the discovery of H. pylori, the therapy of PUD disease was centered on
the old
dictum by Schwartz of ‘no acid,
no ulcer.’
•
Although
acid secretion is still important in the pathogenesis of PUD, eradication of
H. pylori and
therapy/prevention of NSAID-induced disease is the mainstay.
•
The
clinician's goal in treating PUD is to
Provide relief of symptoms (pain
or dyspepsia)
Promote ulcer healing
Prevent ulcer recurrence and
complications
•
Once
an ulcer (GU or DU) is documented, then the main issue at stake is whether
H. pylori or an NSAID is
involved.
•
With
H. pylori present, independent of the NSAID status, triple therapy is
recommended
for 14 days, followed by
continued acid-suppressing drugs (H2 receptor antagonist or
PPIs) for a total of 4 to 6
weeks.
Therapy for H.
Pylori
•
H.
pylori should
be eradicated in patients with documented PUD
•
This
holds true independent of time of presentation (first episode or not), severity
of
symptoms, presence of confounding
factors such as ingestion of NSAIDs, or whether the
an ulcer is in remission.
•
Documented
eradication of H. pylori in patients with PUD is associated with a
dramatic
decrease in ulcer recurrence.
•
Combination
therapy for 14 days provides the greatest efficacy.
•
The
agents used with the greatest frequency include amoxicillin, metronidazole,
tetracycline, clarithromycin, and
bismuth compounds.
Triple Therapy
•
The most common regime in our environment is Amoxicillin, Metronidazole and
omeprazole other regimens include
Lansoprazole, clarithromycin, and
amoxicillin
Bismuth subsalicylate,
tetracycline, and metronidazole, etc.
Dosing
•
Amoxicillin
500 mg PO every 8 hours
•
Metronidazole
400 mg PO every 8 hours
•
Clarithromycin
500 mg PO every 12 hours
•
Omeprazole
20 mg once a day
•
Lansoprazole
20-40 mg once a day
Therapy of
NSAID-Related Gastric or Duodenal Injury
•
Medical
intervention for NSAID-related mucosal injury includes treatment of an active
ulcer and prevention of future
injury.
•
Ideally
the injurious agent should be stopped as the first step in the therapy of an
active
NSAID-induced ulcer.
•
If
that is possible, then treatment with one of the acid inhibitory agents (H2
blockers or
PPIs) is indicated.
•
Cessation
of NSAIDs is not always possible because of the patient's severe underlying
disease (e.g. Arthritis).
•
Only
PPIs can heal Gus or DUs, independent of whether NSAIDs are discontinued.
•
Prevention
of NSAID-induced ulceration can be accomplished by misoprostol (200μg
qid) or a PPI.
•
High-dose
H2 blockers (famotidine, 40 mg bid) have also shown some promise.
•
The majority (>90%) of Gus and DUs heal with the conventional therapy outlined
above
•
GU
that fails to heal after 12 weeks and a DU that doesn't heal after 8 weeks of
therapy
should be considered refractory.
•
Once
poor compliance and persistent H. pylori infection have been excluded, NSAID
use,
either inadvertent or
surreptitious, must be excluded.
•
In
addition, cigarette smoking must be eliminated.
•
For
a GU, malignancy must be meticulously excluded.
•
More
than 90% of refractory ulcers (either DUs or Gus) heal after 8 weeks of
treatment
with higher doses of PPI
(omeprazole, 40 mg/d). This higher dose is also effective in
maintaining remission.
REFERENCES;
•
Braunwald
& Fauci (2001). Harrison’s principles of internal medicine 15th Ed. Oxford: McGraw Hill
•
Davidson,
S (2006). Principles and practice of medicine 20th Ed. Churchill: Livingstone.
Kumar &
Clark (2003) Textbook of clinical medicine. Churchill: Livingstone.
•
Douglas Model (2006): Making sense of
Clinical Examination of the Adult patient. 1st Ed. Hodder Arnold
•
Longmore, M., Wilkinson, I., Baldwin,
A., & Wallin, E. (2014). Oxford handbook of clinical medicine.
Oxford
•
Macleod, J. (2009). Macleod's
clinical examination. G. Douglas, E. F. Nicol, & C. E. Robertson
(Eds.). Elsevier Health Sciences.
•
Nicholson N., (1999), Medicine of
Non-communicable diseases in adults. AMREF
•
Stuart and Saunders (2004): Mental
health Nursing principles and practice. 1st Ed. Mosby
•
Swash,
M., & Glynn, M. (2011). Hutchison's clinical methods: An integrated
approach to clinical practice.

0 Comments